Watson v British Boxing Board of Control | |
---|---|
Court | Court of Appeal of England and Wales |
Full case name | Michael Alexander Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd & World Boxing Organisation Inc |
Decided | 19 December 2000 |
Citation(s) | [2001] QB 1134, [2000] EWCA Civ 2116 |
Transcript(s) | transcript at BAILII[1] |
Case history | |
Prior action(s) | High Court of Justice |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Phillips MR May LJ Laws LJ |
Case opinions | |
Phillips MR | |
Keywords | |
trespass to the person, duty of care, negligence |
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 was a case of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales that established an exception to the defence of consent to trespass to the person and an extension of the duty of care expected in cases of negligence. Michael Watson was injured in a boxing match supervised by the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC or BBBC), which was expected to provide medical care. This care was insufficient, and as such Watson was in a coma for 40 days, and spent 6 years in a wheelchair. After recovering consciousness, he sued the BBBC in negligence, and was awarded approximately £1 million by the High Court of Justice, who determined that the relationship between the BBBC and Watson was sufficient to create a duty of care. This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, who noted that the BBBC had a duty not only to ensure that injuries did not occur, but that injuries were properly treated.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search